MiPT Stats & Data
CC(C)N(C)CCc1cnc2ccccc12KTQJVAJLJZIKKD-UHFFFAOYSA-NToxicity
PsychonautWikiThe toxicity and long-term health effects of recreational MiPT use do not seem to have been studied in any scientific context and the exact toxic dose is unknown. This is because MiPT is a research chemical with very little history of human usage. Anecdotal evidence from those who have tried MiPT suggests that there are no negative health effects attributed to simply trying the drug by itself at low to moderate doses and using it very sparingly (but nothing can be completely guaranteed). Independent research should always be done to ensure that a combination of two or more substances is safe before consumption. It is strongly recommended that one use harm reduction practices when using this drug.
Effect Profile
Curated + 15 ReportsStrong visuals with mild auditory effects and body load, low headspace
Duration Timeline
BluelightTolerance & Pharmacokinetics
drugs.wikiTolerance Decay
Cross-Tolerances
Demographics
Gender Distribution
Too few reports for a chart: gender is known from 14 reports, and a split is drawn only from 20 reports or more. Counts are shown instead. Why 20?
- Male 11 of 14
- Female 1 of 14
- Not Specified 2 of 14
Age Distribution
Reports Over Time
Effect Analysis
Erowid + BluelightEffects aggregated from 15 experience reports (7 single-substance Erowid + 8 Bluelight)
Effect Sentiment Distribution
Confidence Distribution
Each bar is the share of reports mentioning the effect; its whisker, and the band on the rows below, is the 95% interval: where the share could plausibly be with other reports of the same kind.
Too few reports for bars: these effects come from 7 single-substance Erowid and 8 analyzed Bluelight reports, and a bar is drawn only from 20 reports or more. With fewer, a percentage cannot tell a common effect from a rare one. Counts are shown instead. Why 20?
Positive Effects 40
Adverse Effects 8
Show 8 neutral or unclassified mentions
Also reported in combinations. In the 7 MiPT reports where another drug was taken too, 0 mention hospital, emergency services or an overdose, 0 a seizure and 1 psychosis (too few reports for percentages). In the 7 single-substance reports: 1, 0 and 0. These are not in the figures above: they cannot be put down to MiPT alone, and a mention is not always something that happened to the writer.
Real-World Dose Distribution
ErowidFrom 12 of 18 recorded dose entries: those that state a weight (mg, g or µg), in routes with at least five of them. Values above Q3 + 3×IQR, far above what people typically take, are left out; they can include real heavy doses and overdoses, not only mistakes.
Oral (n=12)
Common Combinations
Most co-occurring substances, as a share of all 14 reports filed under MiPT
Too few reports for bars: these combinations come from 14 reports, and a bar is drawn only from 20 reports or more. With fewer, a percentage cannot tell a common effect from a rare one. Counts are shown instead. Why 20?
- THC 6 of 14
Form / Preparation
Most common forms and preparations, as a share of the 10 reports that give one
Too few reports for bars: these forms come from 10 reports, and a bar is drawn only from 20 reports or more. With fewer, a percentage cannot tell a common effect from a rare one. Counts are shown instead. Why 20?
- Powder / Crystals 5 of 10
- Capsule 4 of 10
Redose Patterns
Redosing behavior across 10 reports
Too few reports for a chart: redosing is known from 10 reports, and a split is drawn only from 20 reports or more. Counts are shown instead. Why 20?
- Single dose 7 of 10
- Redosed 3 of 10